Newborn and Mama Research

March 2, 9:04 AM PST

Breastfeeding linked to reduced risk of SIDS

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Women who breastfeed evidently lower the chances that their baby might die of sudden infant death syndrome or SIDS, according to a German study.

Dr. M. M. Vennemann, from the University of Munster, and colleagues therefore recommend that public health messages aimed at SIDS risk-reduction should encourage women to breastfeed their infant through 6 months of age.

The study included 333 infants who died of SIDS and 998 age-matched "control" infants.

Exclusive breastfeeding at 1 month cut the risk of SIDS in half. Partial breastfeeding at this point was also tied to a reduced risk, although that could have been a chance finding.

These results add "to the body of evidence showing that breastfeeding reduces the risk of SIDS, and that this protection continues as long as the infant is breastfed," the investigators conclude.

SOURCE: Pediatrics, March 2009.

Search this site

Click Calendar in menu to enlarge


 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Visit our Facebook page to
Share your favorite resources
Dr Sears to Drs on non-vaccination PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 2
PoorBest 
Parent Resources and Groups
Friday, 09 July 2010 16:55

Dr. Robert Sears from the respected Sears medical family of birth and baby advocates has some things on his mind. When parents choose not to vaccinate their children, can they get medical help and advice that reflects research evidence, compassion or practical help for non-vaccination or low-vaccination? Its a dilemma. An excerpt of the article:

What To Do About All Those Non-Vaccinating Parents

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ dr-bob-sears/vaccine-health- what-to-do_b_563334.html

 

Robert Sears, MD [medical doctor, pediatrician]
May 5, 2010

Today's USA Today story on the increasing trend of vaccine refusal shared some interesting information, but fell short of actually providing useful or workable answers. The article cites a new CDC study that showed in 2003 only 22 percent of parents refused or delayed a vaccine for their child, whereas in 2008 this number soared to 39 percent.

For many years I believe the CDC has been trying to hide the fact that more and more parents are refusing or delaying vaccines. Why? Because if compliant parents hear that their neighbors or friends are questioning vaccines, they might start to think, "Hmm ... maybe I should begin to question vaccines as well. I think I'll start doing some research and educating myself about vaccines instead of just taking my doctor's word for it."
...

...More and more parents are beginning to question the vaccine schedule -- not just the new vaccines, but the manner in which so many are being given at a time. ... the CDC doesn't want those parents who are being good little patients and getting all their shots, no questions asked, to start wondering why more and other parents are refusing.

Then the story turns to the measles epidemic that has "ravaged" the country. While measles can occasionally be severe and cause a fatality, the fact is that measles has remained the same in our country over the last decade -- about 100 to 150 cases each year, with NO increase and NO fatalities! If the CDC is going to convince parents to stop questioning vaccines, they'll need to come up with some better arguments than that.

Hey, I know! How about some new and expanded safety research! The only way non-compliant parents are going to stop worrying about vaccines is if we can give them the type of safety research they want: large-scale, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, long-term research. So, 20 years from now we'll have that research. But what do we do in the meantime?

Here's what the AAP says to do in their official policy (found on page eight of the Red Book, sitting in every single pediatrician's office in the country):

• Treat these parents with respect
• Listen to their concerns
• Clearly discuss the importance of vaccines and the risks of the diseases
• If the parents remain non-compliant, the doctor can serve these patient's needs by (and I quote) "developing a schedule of immunizations that does not require multiple injections at a single visit."
• "Continued refusal after adequate discussion (I continue to quote) SHOULD BE RESPECTED."

The number of physicians who actually follow the AAP's advice is dismally small. I've been creating a growing list of Vaccine Friendly Doctor's on my website who WILL listen and respect these patient's wishes and who will provide an alternative vaccine schedule for patients who want to vaccinate differently. But it's slow going. Find a vaccine-friendly doctor near you  I just don't understand why the AAP would even bother making such a policy if they won't try to get their members to follow it.
 
Dr. Offit and many other physicians like him who believe we should NOT provide alternative schedules are actually MAKING THE PROBLEM WORSE. By kicking these patients out of their office and refusing to vaccinate these patients in a manner they will comply with, these doctors are leaving such babies unvaccinated. On the other hand, sometimes these doctors DO manage to talk (bully) their patients into starting their little two-month-old babies on the regular schedule. Most of these parents end up leaving such a doctor and going somewhere else. ..."

Dr. Bob Sears
www.TheVaccineBook.com

 
joomla hosting: from Simplweb